28/09/2023 China’s over-leveraged property companies are once again hitting
				the headlines. But not, yet, hitting stock markets. That is likely to change now that
				everyone is back from holidays (this summer was the first in four years with no
				Covid-related border restrictions) and as the steady drum beat of Chinese woes increases. In
				August, Country Garden, one of the largest Chinese property developers, had to 
					
						pull 
					
				a share sale
				after it 
					
						warned 
					
				of huge losses
				and 
					
						missed payments
					
					
				 
				on two of its international bonds. It 
					
						managed
					
				 to make
				payments in those USD bonds within hours of the expiration of a grace period and since then
				its creditors have 
					
						agreed
					
				 to extend the
				terms on a number of its onshore bonds. But that doesn’t mean it – or the property sector –
				is out of the woods. 
 On
				the 15th of September, property developer Sino-Ocean 
					
						suspended
					
				 payments on
				all its offshore debt. Then another property business, China Oceanwide Holdings, 
					
						declared
					
				 its
				bankruptcy on 25th September. As is often the way, there are cross shareholdings
				that spread contagion through the system. The bankrupt business is a major shareholder in
				China Minsheng Bank, one of the country’s large second-tier banks, and the 
					
						founder
					
				 of China
				Oceanwide 
					
						sits
					
				 on its board of
				directors. And then came along the poster child for China’s property perturbations:
				Evergrande. At the end of August its shares 
					
						re-opened
					
				 for trading
				on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange for the first time in seventeen months – only for the share
				price to fall 90% as creditor talks were postponed. Despite working on a debt restructuring
				plan during that period, they still haven’t come up with a solution. On Sunday 24th
				September they 
					
						announced 
					
				that an
				ongoing investigation into its main domestic subsidiary would mean it was unable to issue
				any new debt. The government can intervene almost however and whenever it wants. It is
				therefore notable that its actions have been relatively muted. A few regulations have been
				eased 
					
						such as
					
				 reducing
				deposits but the tweaks to mortgage rules only served to deliver a very short-term jump in
				housing sales that have already run out of steam. According to 
					
						Bloomberg
					
				, “Even
				in Beijing, which reacted the most to the stimulus, sales of existing homes plunged 35% to
				about 1,700 units last weekend from 2,600 in the weekend immediately after the easing”.
				There have been no changes to Loan Prime Rates. This suggests that the government is acutely
				aware the Yuan is already under pressure, not to mention that its banks need to preserve
				their net interest margins. Lowering interest rates would only risk making both of those
				issues worse. And it’s not just the property sector that is struggling. The economy,
				hamstrung by the obsession with Zero Covid, has failed to rebound. Youth unemployment hit 
					
						such high levels 
					
				in
				June, at 21.3%, that the government decided to 
					
						stop publishing
					
				 the
				statistic. There is 
					
						barely
					
				 any inflation
				either in 
					
						consumer prices
					
				 or
				producer prices. The much heralded reopening of Chinese borders has had little impact – the
				Chinese comprised a third of tourists to South-East Asia before the pandemic but as of
				August they 
					
						only accounted for
					
				 8%
				of the total. All of this leaves President Xi, 
					
						unconstitutionally elected
					
				
				to a third five year term earlier this year, very much consumed with domestic concerns.
				Hence he 
					
						did not travel
					
				 to the
				recent G20 in India. There has also been the spate of senior officials mysteriously 
					
						disappearing
					
				, with
				the ex-Foreign Minister last seen in June and the Defence Minister last seen in Beijing at
				the end of August. China is an opaque economy but it is clear that all is not well. More
				importantly, it is clear that the government is not about to unleash the stimulus bazooka to
				paper over the cracks. If they could, they would have done so already, before the cracks
				became so apparent. The problem is that a huge stimulus creates bigger political problems
				down the road. If the asset-rich get richer then inequality increases, raising the risk of
				social unrest. They have to keep the show on the road enough that the whole economy doesn’t
				collapse, but they can’t pump up the bubble forever or the political system will end up
				collapsing anyway. This means that we should expect more cracks to appear but only little
				tweaks by the government in response. The Chinese economy isn’t going to come to a crashing
				halt but the authorities are mainly concerned with buying time. But a tremor in China would
				be enough to cause a ripple effect through the rest of the world’s financial system. Western
				nations have been indulging over the last three years in a variety of interventions to
				prevent a recession not only from happening, but from being priced into the markets. This is
				unsustainable. The sheer scale and speed of interest rate increases from the Fed, the Bank
				of England and the ECB have begun to bite in the real economy. Once risky assets re-price
				for this reality then financial conditions will tighten, exacerbating the withdrawal of
				liquidity. With investors having piled into China on the anticipation of a post Covid
				rebound, it will not take much for the money to move back out. Markets are sitting on a bed
				of tinder. It only takes one match to light the fire. China could be the spark. 
					Helen Thomas
					CEO of BlondeMoney
				
					
						All opinions, news, research, analysis, prices or other information is provided as
				general market commentary and not as investment advice and all potential results discussed
				are not guaranteed to be achieved. The information may have been derived from publicly
				available sources, company reports, personal research, or surveys. Past performance is not
				indicative of future performance. Trading carries risk of capital loss. Service available to
				professional clients only.